FeatureFrom Fast to Feast: Insights into the process of reconciliation from South Africa
Reconciliation is a process. It is a long and often difficult road through truth and justice aimed at the restoration of broken relationships, in order to establish a new reconciled reality. There are no quick-fix solutions, no shortcuts or easy roads. The process of reconciliation that is taking place in the church in South Africa illustrates the challenges and offers guidelines for rituals of reconciliation that can help the church worldwide address its ongoing need for reconciliation. A Multicultural ContextSouth Africa is a multicultural country with about eleven official languages. And since the demise of apartheid, many churches that were once divided on racial grounds are uniting. As a result, different cultures have to be accommodated in a single worship service. Along with this multicultural context, some scholars talk about a triad of simultaneous modes of existence in South Africa: pre-modern, modern, and post-modern (W. L. Van der Merwe, “Philosophy and the Multi-Cultural Context of (Post)Apartheid South Africa” in Ethical Perspectives, 1996). The year 2004 marks one decade since South Africa’s first democratic election. It’s a time filled with opportunities for many South Africans. But at the same time, there are many factors hindering the process of reconciliation: a high crime rate, poverty and an imbalance in the distribution of wealth, and the HIV/AIDS pandemic. The following practical guidelines for rituals of reconciliation have their origins in this unique and challenging context. Reconciliation Takes TimeAnthropologist Victor Turner described the social drama as a process through which a society in crisis moves. Gerald Arbuckle illustrates Turner’s social drama as follows: Within this scheme, phase 3 (redressive action) is the phase of ritual. Much of South African society is currently in this phase. It is a time in which the need for ritual is great and where appropriate rituals of reconciliation can positively channel emotions, fears, and attitudes. Some have compared the process though which a society like South Africa has to move after the devastating effects of apartheid with the grieving process—complete with its stages of denial, anger and isolation, negotiation, depression, and acceptance. In her book on the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Afrikaans poet and author Antjie Krog writes, “Yes. Piece by piece we die into reconciliation” (Country of My Skull). The early church understood this process rather well. For that reason they developed their sacrament of reconciliation as a ritual spread over time and with four distinct phases: confession, penance, reconciliation, and partaking of the Eucharist. For the South African context this means that lament is a very important phase. Change brings with it a sense of loss and often requires a response of grieving (see Arbuckle, Grieving for Change). Grieving and lament can find expression in verbal form, as in the Psalms; by making use of symbols and rituals (an extinguished candle, an empty chair at the table, fasting, confession, silence, protest rituals); and—very important in Africa—by storytelling: people coming forward to give witness to their experience of the truth as perpetrators listen. It is important that we not rush into this process of reconciliation. The African concept of time, which is more cyclical, is of great value here. The Western view of time is more linear and inclines us to rush things in order to move on. If there is one thing that Africa has that many other continents do not have, it is time. But it is also important to ensure that the process does move forward and is brought to a conclusion at some stage. Perhaps congregations should aim to move somewhere between a Western functional (too quick) concept of time and an African (sometimes too slow) concept of time. The liturgical year can be helpful here; for example, congregations can develop a reconciliation ritual that stretches over a whole season (such as Lent or Advent). Photos of Reformed Christians worshiping in a township outside of Cape Town. Types of Reconciliation RitualsBy looking at reconciliation rituals worldwide, different types can be identified. These include protest rituals, confession rituals, therapeutic/healing rituals, acceptance/forgiveness rituals, reintegrating/binding rituals, and reparation rituals. And they occur in different phases of the process. Recognizing the different types of reconciliation rituals can help congregations determine where in the reconciliation process they find themselves and what kind of rituals are appropriate to their situation. These are obviously not watertight categories that can be applied like a recipe, but they can provide congregations with insight into the process of reconciliation and guidelines for how to act. For example, the metaphor “fast to feast” can be gleaned from the ritual process of reconciliation used in Africa. In Africa a reconciliation ritual is always concluded with some kind of commensality. Often a sheep or a goat is slaughtered, a large container of Umqombothi (African maize beer) is brewed, and the whole family, congregation, or community will come together to eat and drink and celebrate the consummation of the reconciliation process. If reconciliation is not achieved, no celebration will take place. Although the Dutch Reformed Church is not known to slaughter goats as part of its worship practices, the practice of commensality with regards to reconciliation as a means to “manage” the ritual time is not unknown. Think of the exclusion of sinners from the table of the Lord. This exclusion is aimed at bringing the sinner back to the church and to reconcile her with her neighbor, and the process culminates in partaking of the Lord’s Supper as a sacrament of reconciliation. Sometimes fasting is necessary in order to achieve a feast of reconciliation. In the Xhosa culture this ritual of building up to a feast of reconciliation, which is also being used in some Reformed churches, follows a certain pattern:
When developing such a ritual, it is important to achieve a fine balance between continuity and discontinuity with the tradition. Honor the tension between tradition and renewal. Respect for (dis)continuity with the liturgical tradition is conducive for the appropriation of the new ritual. Rather than just incorporating something totally new, it is often wiser first to try and renew that which is already there. Also, when we consider developing a ritual for reconciliation, it can be helpful to pay attention to special dates—such as December 16 (now Reconciliation Day in South Africa, previously the Day of the Vow, celebrating the white man’s defeat of the Zulu nation in 1838), September 11 (USA), or Easter Sunday. Such occasions can, in a temporal symbolic way, show why reconciliation is needed. The date suggests the reason for the ritual in order to open up new possibilities of reconciliation. The Church’s GiftReconciliation is the ministry of the church. One of the resources of the church, through which it can offer its ministry of reconciliation to the world, is the ritual treasure that can be found in the liturgy. Consider the following prayers and confessions from South Africa: In a world where God’s name is desecrated, In the midst of political kingdoms at war with each other, In societies divided by injustice, class, or race consciousness, In the midst of hope for a new tomorrow, In the face of anger and hatred, —When Prayer Makes News: Churches and O Lord, —Douglas Bax, in Cry Justice! Prayers, Meditations and Readings from South Africa by J. W. De Gruchy. London: Collins Liturgical Publications, 1976. God bless Africa. —This “Prayer for Africa” is being used in the conclusion of the liturgy It’s time to stimulate the imagination of churches everywhere in using and developing this resource for ritual reconciliation. The church, as the body of Christ, the Great Reconciler, must strive to be his shining example of reconciliation.
ExcerptRecommended ReadingAckermann, D. “On Hearing and Lamenting: Faith and Truth-Telling.” To Remember and to Heal. Theological and Psychological Reflections on Truth and Reconciliation. H. R. Botman and R. M. Petersen (eds.). Cape Town/Pretoria/Johannesburg: Human & Rousseau, 1996. Arbuckle, G. A. Grieving for Change. A Spirituality for Refounding Gospel Communities. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1991. De Gruchy, J. W. Cry Justice! Prayers, Meditations and Readings from South Africa. London: Collins Liturgical Publications. 1986. De Gruchy, J. W. Reconciliation. Restoring Justice. Cape Town: David Philip, 2002. Hay, M. “Ukubuyisana. Reconciliation in South Africa.” Dissertation, Catholic Theological Union of Chicago, 1997. Müller, B. A. “The Role of Worship and Ethics on the Road Towards Reconciliation.” Jaarboek voor liturgie-onderzoek 18, 27-44. 2002. Post, P. G. J. et al. Disaster Ritual. Explorations of an Emerging Ritual Repertoire. Liturgia Condenda 15. Leuven/Paris/Dudley, MA: Peeters, 2003. Schreiter, R. J. Reconciliation. Mission and Ministry in a Changing Social Order. Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 1992. __________ Author
Cas Wepener Cas Wepener (cwepener@sun.ac.za) is a minister in a Dutch Reformed congregation in Cape Town, South Africa and a researcher at BUVTON, Faculty of Theology, Stellenbosch University. See other articles on:Apartheid -- South Africa | Reconciliation | Prayers | Healing | Social justice | |
|
Copyright © 2009, Faith Alive Christian Resources. All rights reserved.
Comments about the content or usability of this site? Contact us. Site Map | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Menu By Milonic |